Banner Ad Critic ? Why Your Banners Suck | Scoop

Display advertising is tricky business. It?s a challenge getting people to click your ads. And when you do get them to click it?s a challenge to get them to convert. By the time you?ve got the conversion thing figured out your previously effective banners may be losing their potency.

When you get it right though ? It can mean huge profits.

Let?s take a look at the banner portion of that equation. We?re going to look at ?good starts? and ?bad starts.? We?re saying it?s a ?start? because you?ll never be done designing banners. You?ll always be testing to improve CTR, improve conversions, etc. To think you?d ever create a set of banners and be done is foolhardy.

Now don?t get all worked up if you don?t agree with my opinion on some of these banners. It?s not an exact science and sometimes banners that you?d never think would work do well.

So with that said ? let the show begin?

Good Starts

#1 Apple
http://www.moat.com/search/results?q=Apple

These ads have a super clean design (as does all of Apple?s products). This tech giant knows design better than most. Their banner ads are no exception. They?re easy on the eye and the call to action button pops right out.

click to enlarge

#2 Liberty Investor
http://www.moat.com/search/results?r=1&q=Libertyinvestor.com

These are a bit ugly but I?ve seen banners like this work very well in the past. They?re simple, ugly, and have blue text that screams ?hyper link.? People click blue text on the web. Even when it?s a banner.

click to enlarge

#3 Drive Arcade
http://www.moat.com/search/results?r=1&q=Drive+Arcade

These are very interesting. You might look at these and say ?wtf??

But these banners are more clever than their simple design lets on. First of all they look like a video with that big play button (instantly going to increase clicks). Second of all the background clearly looks like a video game (speaking to a very specific demographic). The end result = most people that click this ad are expecting a video of a driving game.

click to enlarge

Bad Starts

#1 Bleacher Report
http://www.moat.com/search/results?r=1&q=Bleacher+Report

Too Busy! The background images create a lot of visual noise taking away from the copy and the call to action.

click to enlarge

#2 ? T.M. Lewin
http://www.moat.com/search/results?r=1&q=T.m.+Lewin

click to enlage

At what point does minimalist design become ineffective? Take a look at these banners. Some are better than others. The one that sticks out the most as a glaringly bad example is the red square that simply says T.M. Lewin and nothing else.

Either they?re vain enough to think that people just know their brand (I didn?t) OR they?re playing on the fact that you might not and are intrigued enough by the bold redness to click. Either way ? it?s lame (in my humble opinion, of course).

#3 ? PolygonHomes.com
http://www.moat.com/search/results?r=1&q=PolygonHomes.com

Holy Crap! What am I supposed to look at here? Nuff said.

click to enlarge

#4 ? Long Jewelers
http://www.moat.com/search/results?r=1&q=Long+Jewelers

My biggest pet peeve is a lack of a call to action (and not responding to my emails ? but that?s a different story).

That?s Internet marketing 101! No call to action and you get exactly what?you?ve?asked for. Nothing.

Beyond that I found the text very hard to read. If I feel like I have to ?work? just to read your banner I?m going to skip right over it.

?

Scridb filter

Source: http://www.offervault.com/scoop/2012/10/25/banner-ad-critic-why-your-banners-suck/

yolo liquidmetal